Does King Lear Play The Tragic :: essays research papers

Does King Lear Play the Tragic Hero, or the despot?It is quite possible to make an argument in favour of all make out, an argument that would prove to be quite a debate, although one answer would weigh in favour of the other. To prove this, certain elements would have to be analysed thoroughly, all aspects taken into context and sufficient research done into the matter. This is the nevertheless method in which a fair debate of the argument stool be taken into consideration.We can only find the answer to this unbelief if we know what the two arguments mean this will provide a unanimous base onto which the rest of the debate can rest, a foundation of fact. Aristotle, a great founder of the definition of calamity used the word purging to describe the effects of true tragedy on the spectator. Aristotle stated that the advise of tragedy was to invoke pity and terror, and thereby effect the catharsis of these emotions. new(prenominal) critics see tragedy as a moral lesson in wh ich veneration and pity are excited by the sad electric ray&8217s fate serve to warn the spectator not to similarly ask round providence. This interpretation is generally accepted that through experiencing fear vicariously in a controlled situation, the spectators own anxieties are directed outward, and, through sympathetic acknowledgement was the protagonist, his insight and outlook are enlarged.Also, as importantly and significantly, Aristotle introduced the term hamartia, the tragic flaw, or an inherent defect or shortcoming in the hero of a tragedy. Aristotle casually described the tragic hero as a man of noble rank and nature whose misfortune is not brought upon him by villainy or corruption, but by some error of judgement. This disfigurement later became known, or interpreted as a moral flaw, although some great tragedies defy such a simple distinction of the term. We could swear that in many cases of tragedy the hero is never passive, but struggles to fragmentise his tragic difficulty with an obsessive dedication, that he is guilty of presuming that he is godlike, attempting to outdo his own human limitations.The need, or lack of order in a society, could be a reason why the tragedy came to be, and is known in Greek terms as hubris. This ethical and religious thought portrays the resulting implications of irreverent disregard of the limits governing human action in an orderly universe. It is the ejaculate to which the great and the gifted are most susceptible, and in Greek tragedy is usually the hero&8217s tragic flaw.